Home  ›  what actually causes a cepheid to vary in apparent brightness?

what actually causes a cepheid to vary in apparent brightness?

Written By Thursday, April 7, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Type of variable star that pulsates radially

A Cepheid variable () is a type of star that pulsates radially, varying in both diameter and temperature and producing changes in brightness with a well-defined stable period and amplitude.

A strong directly relationship between a Cepheid variable's luminosity and pulsation period established Cepheids equally important indicators of cosmic benchmarks for scaling galactic and extragalactic distances. This robust characteristic of classical Cepheids was discovered in 1908 by Henrietta Swan Leavitt after studying thousands of variable stars in the Magellanic Clouds. This discovery allows one to know the true luminosity of a Cepheid past merely observing its pulsation menses. This in turn allows one to determine the distance to the star, by comparison its known luminosity to its observed brightness.

The term Cepheid originates from Delta Cephei in the constellation Cepheus, identified by John Goodricke in 1784, the first of its type to exist so identified.

The mechanics of stellar pulsation every bit a heat-engine was proposed in 1917 by Arthur Stanley Eddington (who wrote at length on the dynamics of Cepheids), but it was non until 1953 that S. A. Zhevakin identified ionized helium as a probable valve for the engine.

History [edit]

On September x, 1784, Edward Pigott detected the variability of Eta Aquilae, the starting time known representative of the form of classical Cepheid variables.[1] The eponymous star for classical Cepheids, Delta Cephei, was discovered to be variable by John Goodricke a few months afterwards.[2] The number of similar variables grew to several dozen by the end of the 19th century, and they were referred to as a class as Cepheids.[3] Nearly of the Cepheids were known from the distinctive lite curve shapes with the rapid increase in brightness and a hump, but some with more than symmetrical light curves were known equally Geminids after the prototype ζ Geminorum.[4]

A relationship between the period and luminosity for classical Cepheids was discovered in 1908 by Henrietta Swan Leavitt in an investigation of thousands of variable stars in the Magellanic Clouds.[5] She published information technology in 1912 with further evidence.[6]

In 1913, Ejnar Hertzsprung attempted to find distances to 13 Cepheids using their motion through the sky.[vii] (His results would later require revision.) In 1918, Harlow Shapley used Cepheids to place initial constraints on the size and shape of the Milky Way and of the placement of our Dominicus within it.[8] In 1924, Edwin Hubble established the distance to classical Cepheid variables in the Andromeda Galaxy, until then known as the "Andromeda Nebula" and showed that those variables were not members of the Milky way. Hubble's finding settled the question raised in the "Bang-up Debate" of whether the Milky way represented the entire Universe or was merely 1 of many galaxies in the Universe.[ix]

In 1929, Hubble and Milton L. Humason formulated what is now known as Hubble's Law by combining Cepheid distances to several galaxies with Vesto Slipher's measurements of the speed at which those galaxies recede from u.s.. They discovered that the Universe is expanding, confirming the theories of Georges Lemaître.[10]

Analogy of Cepheid variables (reddish dots) at the heart of the Milky Style[11]

In the mid 20th century, pregnant problems with the astronomical distance scale were resolved by dividing the Cepheids into different classes with very unlike backdrop. In the 1940s, Walter Baade recognized two dissever populations of Cepheids (classical and type 2). Classical Cepheids are younger and more than massive population I stars, whereas type II Cepheids are older, fainter Population Ii stars.[12] Classical Cepheids and blazon Ii Cepheids follow different period-luminosity relationships. The luminosity of blazon II Cepheids is, on average, less than classical Cepheids by well-nigh one.5 magnitudes (but all the same brighter than RR Lyrae stars). Baade's seminal discovery led to a twofold increment in the distance to M31, and the extragalactic distance calibration.[13] [14] RR Lyrae stars, and then known as Cluster Variables, were recognized adequately early every bit being a separate grade of variable, due in office to their short periods.[15] [16]

The mechanics of the pulsation as a estrus-engine was proposed in 1917 by Arthur Stanley Eddington[17] (who wrote at length on the dynamics of Cepheids), simply it was not until 1953 that South. A. Zhevakin identified ionized helium equally a probable valve for the engine.[xviii]

Classes [edit]

Cepheid variables are divided into two subclasses which exhibit markedly dissimilar masses, ages, and evolutionary histories: classical Cepheids and type II Cepheids. Delta Scuti variables are A-type stars on or almost the main sequence at the lower cease of the instability strip and were originally referred to every bit dwarf Cepheids. RR Lyrae variables have brusque periods and lie on the instability strip where it crosses the horizontal branch. Delta Scuti variables and RR Lyrae variables are not mostly treated with Cepheid variables although their pulsations originate with the aforementioned helium ionisation kappa machinery.

Classical Cepheids [edit]

Low-cal curve of Delta Cephei, the prototype of classical cepheids, showing the regular variations produced by intrinsic stellar pulsations

Classical Cepheids (also known as Population I Cepheids, type I Cepheids, or Delta Cepheid variables) undergo pulsations with very regular periods on the gild of days to months. Classical Cepheids are Population I variable stars which are 4–twenty times more massive than the Sun,[nineteen] and up to 100,000 times more than luminous.[xx] These Cepheids are yellow bright giants and supergiants of spectral form F6 – K2 and their radii change by (~25% for the longer-menses I Carinae) millions of kilometers during a pulsation cycle.[21]

Classical Cepheids are used to determine distances to galaxies within the Local Grouping and across, and are a means by which the Hubble abiding tin be established.[22] [23] [24] [25] [26] Classical Cepheids accept also been used to clarify many characteristics of our galaxy, such every bit the Sun's height above the galactic plane and the Galaxy's local screw structure.[27]

A group of classical Cepheids with minor amplitudes and sinusoidal lite curves are oftentimes separated out as Minor Amplitude Cepheids or s-Cepheids, many of them pulsating in the first overtone.

Blazon II Cepheids [edit]

Type II Cepheids (also termed Population II Cepheids) are population II variable stars which pulsate with periods typically betwixt i and l days.[12] [28] Type II Cepheids are typically metal-poor, erstwhile (~10 Gyr), low mass objects (~half the mass of the Dominicus). Type II Cepheids are divided into several subgroups past menses. Stars with periods between 1 and four days are of the BL Her subclass, 10–20 days belong to the Due west Virginis subclass, and stars with periods greater than xx days belong to the RV Tauri subclass.[12] [28]

Blazon Ii Cepheids are used to plant the altitude to the Galactic Eye, globular clusters, and galaxies.[27] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34]

Dissonant Cepheids [edit]

A group of pulsating stars on the instability strip have periods of less than ii days, similar to RR Lyrae variables just with higher luminosities. Dissonant Cepheid variables have masses college than blazon Two Cepheids, RR Lyrae variables, and our sun. It is unclear whether they are young stars on a "turned-back" horizontal branch, blueish stragglers formed through mass transfer in binary systems, or a mix of both.[35] [36]

Double-style Cepheids [edit]

A small proportion of Cepheid variables have been observed to pulsate in two modes at the same time, usually the fundamental and first overtone, occasionally the second overtone.[37] A very small-scale number pulsate in three modes, or an unusual combination of modes including higher overtones.[38]

Uncertain distances [edit]

Chief amid the uncertainties tied to the classical and blazon II Cepheid altitude scale are: the nature of the period-luminosity relation in various passbands, the impact of metallicity on both the zero-point and gradient of those relations, and the effects of photometric contamination (blending with other stars) and a changing (typically unknown) extinction constabulary on Cepheid distances. All these topics are actively debated in the literature.[23] [20] [25] [32] [39] [forty] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46]

These unresolved matters have resulted in cited values for the Hubble abiding (established from Classical Cepheids) ranging between 60 km/due south/Mpc and 80 km/s/Mpc.[22] [23] [24] [25] [26] Resolving this discrepancy is one of the foremost issues in astronomy since the cosmological parameters of the Universe may be constrained by supplying a precise value of the Hubble constant.[24] [26] Uncertainties have diminished over the years, due in part to discoveries such as RS Puppis.

Delta Cephei is also of particular importance every bit a calibrator of the Cepheid catamenia-luminosity relation since its distance is among the almost precisely established for a Cepheid, partly because information technology is a member of a star cluster[47] [48] and the availability of precise Hubble Space Telescope/Hipparcos parallaxes.[49] The accuracy of parallax distance measurements to Cepheid variables and other bodies within 7,500 light-years is vastly improved by comparing images from Hubble taken six months apart when the Earth and Hubble are on contrary sides of the Sun.[50]

Pulsation model [edit]

The accepted caption for the pulsation of Cepheids is chosen the Eddington valve,[51] [52] or "κ-mechanism", where the Greek letter κ (kappa) is the usual symbol for the gas opacity.

Helium is the gas thought to be most active in the process. Doubly ionized helium (helium whose atoms are missing both electrons) is more opaque than singly ionized helium. The more than helium is heated, the more ionized it becomes. At the dimmest office of a Cepheid's bike, the ionized gas in the outer layers of the star is opaque, and and so is heated by the star'south radiation, and due to the increased temperature, begins to expand. Equally information technology expands, information technology cools, and so becomes less ionized and therefore more than transparent, allowing the radiation to escape. Then the expansion stops, and reverses due to the star'southward gravitational attraction. The procedure then repeats.

In 1879, August Ritter (1826–1908) demonstrated that the adiabatic radial pulsation period for a homogeneous sphere is related to its surface gravity and radius through the relation:

T = k R g {\displaystyle T=thousand\,{\sqrt {\frac {R}{k}}}}

where thousand is a proportionality abiding. Now, since the surface gravity is related to the sphere mass and radius through the relation:

one thousand = k ′ M R two = m ′ R M R 3 = k ′ R ρ {\displaystyle g=k'{\frac {M}{R^{2}}}=k'{\frac {RM}{R^{3}}}=k'R\rho }

one finally obtains:

T ρ = Q {\displaystyle T{\sqrt {\rho }}=Q}

where Q is a constant, called the pulsation abiding.[53]

Examples [edit]

Time lapse of the Cepheid type variable star Polaris illustrating the visual appearance of its cycle of effulgence changes.

  • Classical Cepheids include: Eta Aquilae, Zeta Geminorum, Beta Doradus, RT Aurigae, Polaris, as well every bit Delta Cephei.
  • Blazon 2 Cepheids include: W Virginis and BL Herculis.[54]
  • Anomalous Cepheids include: XZ Ceti[55] (overtone pulsation mode)[56] and BL Boötis.

See list [edit]

  • List of stars in Puppis

References [edit]

  1. ^ Pigott, Edward (1785). "Observations of a new variable star". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Lodge. 75: 127–136. Bibcode:1785RSPT...75..127P. doi:10.1098/rstl.1785.0007. S2CID 186212958.
  2. ^ Goodricke, John (1786). "A series of observations on, and a discovery of, the period of the variation of the calorie-free of the star marked δ by Bayer, about the head of Cepheus. In a letter from John Goodricke, Esq. to Nevil Maskelyne, D.D.F.R.S. and Astronomer Regal". Philosophical Transactions of the Majestic Club of London. 76: 48–61. Bibcode:1786RSPT...76...48G. doi:10.1098/rstl.1786.0002.
  3. ^ Clarke, Agnes Mary (1903). Issues in Astrophysics. London, England: Adam & Charles Blackness. p. 319. ISBN9780403014781.
  4. ^ Engle, Scott (2015). The Underground Lives of Cepheids: A Multi-Wavelength Study of the Atmospheres and Real-Time Evolution of Classical Cepheids (Thesis). arXiv:1504.02713. Bibcode:2015PhDT........45E. doi:ten.5281/zenodo.45252.
  5. ^ Leavitt, Henrietta S. (1908). "1777 variables in the Magellanic Clouds". Annals of the Astronomical Observatory of Harvard Higher. 60 (4): 87–108. Bibcode:1908AnHar..sixty...87L.
  6. ^ Leavitt, Henrietta S.; Pickering, Edward C. (1912). "Periods of 25 variable stars in the Small Magellanic Deject". Harvard College Observatory Round. 173: 1–3. Bibcode:1912HarCi.173....1L.
  7. ^ Hertzsprung, Eastward. (1913). "Über dice räumliche Verteilung der Veränderlichen vom δ Cephei-Typus" [On the spatial distribution of variable [stars] of the δ Cephei type]. Astronomische Nachrichten (in German). 196 (4692): 201–208. Bibcode:1913AN....196..201H.
  8. ^ Shapley, H. (1918). "Globular Clusters and the Structure of the Galactic System". Publications of the Astronomical Social club of the Pacific. thirty (173): 42. Bibcode:1918PASP...xxx...42S. doi:ten.1086/122686.
  9. ^ Hubble, East. P. (1925). "Cepheids in spiral nebulae". The Observatory. 48: 139. Bibcode:1925Obs....48..139H.
  10. ^ Lemaître, G. (1927). "United nations Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques". Annales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles. 47: 49. Bibcode:1927ASSB...47...49L.
  11. ^ "VISTA Discovers New Component of Milky Way". Retrieved 29 Oct 2015.
  12. ^ a b c Wallerstein, George (2002). "The Cepheids of Population 2 and Related Stars". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 114 (797): 689–699. Bibcode:2002PASP..114..689W. doi:x.1086/341698.
  13. ^ Baade, W. (1958). "Bug in the conclusion of the altitude of galaxies". Astronomical Journal. 63: 207. Bibcode:1958AJ.....63..207B. doi:ten.1086/107726.
  14. ^ Allen, Nick. "Section 2: The Slap-up Debate and the Bully Mistake: Shapley, Hubble, Baade". The Cepheid Distance Scale: A History. Archived from the original on Dec x, 2007.
  15. ^ Shapley, Harlow. (1918). "No. 153. Studies based on the colors and magnitudes in stellar clusters. 8th paper: The luminosities and distances of 139 Cepheid variables". Contributions from the Mount Wilson Observatory. 153: 1. Bibcode:1918CMWCI.153....1S.
  16. ^ Shapley, Harlow (1918). "Studies based on the colors and magnitudes in stellar clusters. Eighth newspaper: The luminosities and distances of 139 Cepheid variables". Astrophysical Journal. 48: 279–294. Bibcode:1918ApJ....48..279S. doi:10.1086/142435.
  17. ^ Eddington, A. South. (1917). "The pulsation theory of Cepheid variables". The Observatory. 40: 290. Bibcode:1917Obs....40..290E.
  18. ^ Zhevakin, S. A. (1953). "К Теории Цефеид. I". Астрономический журнал. xxx: 161–179.
  19. ^ Turner, David Grand. (1996). "The Progenitors of Classical Cepheid Variables". Journal of the Imperial Astronomical Lodge of Canada. 90: 82. Bibcode:1996JRASC..90...82T.
  20. ^ a b Turner, David 1000. (2010). "The PL calibration for Galaxy Cepheids and its implications for the altitude scale". Astrophysics and Infinite Scientific discipline. 326 (2): 219–231. arXiv:0912.4864. Bibcode:2010Ap&SS.326..219T. doi:x.1007/s10509-009-0258-5. S2CID 119264970.
  21. ^ Rodgers, A. W. (1957). "Radius variation and population type of cepheid variables". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 117: 85–94. Bibcode:1957MNRAS.117...85R. doi:10.1093/mnras/117.1.85.
  22. ^ a b Freedman, Wendy L.; Madore, Barry F.; Gibson, Brad K.; Ferrarese, Laura; Kelson, Daniel D.; Sakai, Shoko; Mould, Jeremy R.; Kennicutt, Jr., Robert C.; Ford, Holland C.; Graham, John A.; Huchra, John P.; Hughes, Shaun M. 1000.; Illingworth, Garth D.; Macri, Lucas Yard.; Stetson, Peter B. (2001). "Terminal Results from the Hubble Infinite Telescope Cardinal Projection to Measure out the Hubble Constant". The Astrophysical Journal. 553 (1): 47–72. arXiv:astro.ph/0012376. Bibcode:2001ApJ...553...47F. doi:10.1086/320638. S2CID 119097691.
  23. ^ a b c Tammann, 1000. A.; Sandage, A.; Reindl, B. (2008). "The expansion field: the value of H 0". The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review. 15 (iv): 289–331. arXiv:0806.3018. Bibcode:2008A&ARv..15..289T. doi:10.1007/s00159-008-0012-y. S2CID 18463474.
  24. ^ a b c Freedman, Wendy L.; Madore, Barry F. (2010). "The Hubble Constant". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 48: 673–710. arXiv:1004.1856. Bibcode:2010ARA&A..48..673F. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101829. S2CID 13909389.
  25. ^ a b c Ngeow, C.; Kanbur, S. M. (2006). "The Hubble Constant from Type Ia Supernovae Calibrated with the Linear and Nonlinear Cepheid Menstruum-Luminosity Relations". The Astrophysical Periodical. 642 (1): L29–L32. arXiv:astro.ph/0603643. Bibcode:2006ApJ...642L..29N. doi:10.1086/504478. S2CID 17860528.
  26. ^ a b c Macri, Lucas M.; Riess, Adam M.; Guzik, Joyce Ann; Bradley, Paul A. (2009). "The SH0ES Project: Observations of Cepheids in NGC 4258 and Type Ia SN Hosts". AIP Conference Proceedings. Stellar Pulsation: Challenges for Theory and Observation: Proceedings of the International Conference. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 1170. pp. 23–25. Bibcode:2009AIPC.1170...23M. doi:10.1063/ane.3246452.
  27. ^ a b Majaess, D. J.; Turner, D. M.; Lane, D. J. (2009). "Characteristics of the Galaxy co-ordinate to Cepheids". Monthly Notices of the Imperial Astronomical Lodge. 398 (one): 263–270. arXiv:0903.4206. Bibcode:2009MNRAS.398..263M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15096.x. S2CID 14316644.
  28. ^ a b Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M. One thousand.; Kubiak, Thousand.; Pietrzyński, G.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Szewczyk, O.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R. (2008). "The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-3 Catalog of Variable Stars. II.Type II Cepheids and Anomalous Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Acta Astronomica. 58: 293. arXiv:0811.3636. Bibcode:2008AcA....58..293S.
  29. ^ Kubiak, M.; Udalski, A. (2003). "The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Population II Cepheids in the Galactic Burl". Acta Astronomica. 53: 117. arXiv:astro.ph/0306567. Bibcode:2003AcA....53..117K.
  30. ^ Matsunaga, Noriyuki; Fukushi, Hinako; Nakada, Yoshikazu; Tanabé, Toshihiko; Feast, Michael W.; Menzies, John W.; Ita, Yoshifusa; Nishiyama, Shogo; et al. (2006). "The period-luminosity relation for type Ii Cepheids in globular clusters". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 370 (4): 1979–1990. arXiv:astro.ph/0606609. Bibcode:2006MNRAS.370.1979M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10620.x. S2CID 25991504.
  31. ^ Banquet, Michael W.; Laney, Clifton D.; Kinman, Thomas D.; Van Leeuwen, Floor; Whitelock, Patricia A. (2008). "The luminosities and distance scales of blazon Ii Cepheid and RR Lyrae variables". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 386 (4): 2115–2134. arXiv:0803.0466. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.386.2115F. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13181.x. S2CID 14459638.
  32. ^ a b Majaess, D.; Turner, D.; Lane, D. (2009). "Type Two Cepheids as Extragalactic Distance Candles". Acta Astronomica. 59 (4): 403. arXiv:0909.0181. Bibcode:2009AcA....59..403M.
  33. ^ Majaess, D. J. (2010). "RR Lyrae and Type Ii Cepheid Variables Adhere to a Common Altitude Relation". The Journal of the American Clan of Variable Star Observers. 38 (1): 100–112. arXiv:0912.2928. Bibcode:2010JAVSO..38..100M.
  34. ^ Matsunaga, Noriyuki; Banquet, Michael W.; Menzies, John W. (2009). "Period-luminosity relations for type Ii Cepheids and their application". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society . 397 (2): 933–942. arXiv:0904.4701. Bibcode:2009MNRAS.397..933M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14992.10. S2CID 13912466.
  35. ^ Caputo, F.; Castellani, V.; Degl'Innocenti, Southward.; Fiorentino, G.; Marconi, M. (2004). "Vivid metal-poor variables: Why Anomalous Cepheids?". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 424 (3): 927–934. arXiv:astro.ph/0405395. Bibcode:2004A&A...424..927C. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040307. S2CID 45306570.
  36. ^ Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, Grand. K.; Kubiak, Chiliad.; Pietrzyński, G.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Szewczyk, O.; Ulaczyk, G.; Poleski, R. (2008). "The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. II.Type Ii Cepheids and Anomalous Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Acta Astronomica. 58: 293. arXiv:0811.3636. Bibcode:2008AcA....58..293S.
  37. ^ Smolec, R.; Moskalik, P. (2008). "Double-Style Classical Cepheid Models, Revisited". Acta Astronomica. 58: 233. arXiv:0809.1986. Bibcode:2008AcA....58..233S.
  38. ^ Soszynski, I.; Poleski, R.; Udalski, A.; Kubiak, M.; Szymanski, M. Chiliad.; Pietrzynski, G.; Wyrzykowski, L.; Szewczyk, O.; Ulaczyk, 1000. (2008). "The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Triple-Way and 1O/3O Double-Manner Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Acta Astronomica. 58: 153. arXiv:0807.4182. Bibcode:2008AcA....58..153S.
  39. ^ Benedict, G. Fritz; McArthur, Barbara Eastward.; Feast, Michael Due west.; Barnes, Thomas G.; Harrison, Thomas Due east.; Patterson, Richard J.; Menzies, John Due west.; Edible bean, Jacob Fifty.; Freedman, Wendy L. (2007). "Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor Parallaxes of Galactic Cepheid Variable Stars: Period-Luminosity Relations". The Astronomical Journal. 133 (4): 1810. arXiv:astro.ph/0612465. Bibcode:2007AJ....133.1810B. doi:10.1086/511980.
  40. ^ Stanek, K. Z.; Udalski, A. (1999). "The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Investigating the Influence of Blending on the Cepheid Altitude Scale with Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud". arXiv:astro-ph/9909346.
  41. ^ Udalski, A.; Wyrzykowski, L.; Pietrzynski, Thou.; Szewczyk, O.; Szymanski, Chiliad.; Kubiak, K.; Soszynski, I.; Zebrun, Thousand. (2001). "The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Cepheids in the Milky way IC1613: No Dependence of the Flow-Luminosity Relation on Metallicity". Acta Astronomica. 51: 221. arXiv:astro.ph/0109446. Bibcode:2001AcA....51..221U.
  42. ^ Macri, L. M.; Stanek, K. Z.; Bersier, D.; Greenhill, L. J.; Reid, Grand. J. (2006). "A New Cepheid Distance to the Maser‐Host Galaxy NGC 4258 and Its Implications for the Hubble Constant". The Astrophysical Journal. 652 (ii): 1133–1149. arXiv:astro.ph/0608211. Bibcode:2006ApJ...652.1133M. doi:10.1086/508530. S2CID 15728812.
  43. ^ Bono, Thou.; Caputo, F.; Fiorentino, G.; Marconi, M.; Musella, I. (2008). "Cepheids in External Galaxies. I. The Maser‐Host Galaxy NGC 4258 and the Metallicity Dependence of Catamenia‐Luminosity and Period‐Wesenheit Relations". The Astrophysical Periodical. 684 (i): 102–117. arXiv:0805.1592. Bibcode:2008ApJ...684..102B. doi:10.1086/589965. S2CID 6275274.
  44. ^ Madore, Barry F.; Freedman, Wendy L. (2009). "Concerning the Gradient of the Cepheid Menses-Luminosity Relation". The Astrophysical Periodical. 696 (two): 1498–1501. arXiv:0902.3747. Bibcode:2009ApJ...696.1498M. doi:x.1088/0004-637X/696/ii/1498. S2CID 16325249.
  45. ^ Scowcroft, 5.; Bersier, D.; Mould, J. R.; Wood, P. R. (2009). "The effect of metallicity on Cepheid magnitudes and the altitude to M33". Monthly Notices of the Imperial Astronomical Club. 396 (3): 1287–1296. arXiv:0903.4088. Bibcode:2009MNRAS.396.1287S. doi:x.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14822.x.
  46. ^ Majaess, D. (2010). "The Cepheids of Centaurus A (NGC 5128) and Implications for H0". Acta Astronomica. 60 (ii): 121. arXiv:1006.2458. Bibcode:2010AcA....lx..121M.
  47. ^ De Zeeuw, P. T.; Hoogerwerf, R.; De Bruijne, J. H. J.; Brownish, A. G. A.; Blaauw, A. (1999). "A HIPPARCOS Census of the Nearby OB Associations". The Astronomical Journal. 117 (one): 354–399. arXiv:astro.ph/9809227. Bibcode:1999AJ....117..354D. doi:x.1086/300682. S2CID 16098861.
  48. ^ Majaess, D.; Turner, D.; Gieren, W. (2012). "New Bear witness Supporting Cluster Membership for the Keystone Calibrator Delta Cephei". The Astrophysical Periodical. 747 (ii): 145. arXiv:1201.0993. Bibcode:2012ApJ...747..145M. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/747/two/145. S2CID 118672744.
  49. ^ Benedict, G. Fritz; McArthur, B. E.; Fredrick, L. W.; Harrison, T. E.; Slesnick, C. L.; Rhee, J.; Patterson, R. J.; Skrutskie, Grand. F.; Franz, O. G.; Wasserman, L. H.; Jefferys, West. H.; Nelan, E.; Van Altena, Due west.; Shelus, P. J.; Hemenway, P. D.; Duncombe, R. Fifty.; Story, D.; Whipple, A. L.; Bradley, A. J. (2002). "Astrometry with the Hubble Infinite Telescope: A Parallax of the Central Distance Calibrator δ Cephei". The Astronomical Journal. 124 (3): 1695. arXiv:astro.ph/0206214. Bibcode:2002AJ....124.1695B. doi:10.1086/342014. S2CID 42655824.
  50. ^ Riess, Adam G.; Casertano, Stefano; Anderson, Jay; MacKenty, John; Filippenko, Alexei V. (2014). "Parallax beyond a Kiloparsec from Spatially Scanning the Wide Field Camera 3 on the Hubble Infinite Telescope". The Astrophysical Periodical. 785 (2): 161. arXiv:1401.0484. Bibcode:2014ApJ...785..161R. doi:ten.1088/0004-637X/785/2/161. S2CID 55928992.
  51. ^ Smith, D. H. (1984). "Eddington'south Valve and Cepheid Pulsations". Sky and Telescope. 68: 519. Bibcode:1984S&T....68..519S.
  52. ^ "American Association of Variable Star Observers". The Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2001. doi:10.1888/0333750888/4130. ISBN0333750888.
  53. ^ Maurizio Salaris; Santi Cassisi (13 December 2005). Evolution of Stars and Stellar Populations. John Wiley & Sons. p. 180. ISBN978-0-470-09222-4.
  54. ^ Gorynya, N. A.; Samus, N. Due north.; Rastorguev, A. Southward.; Sachkov, Grand. E. (1996). "A spectroscopic study of the pulsating star BL Her". Astronomy Letters. 22 (iii): 326. Bibcode:1996AstL...22..326G.
  55. ^ Szabados, 50.; Buss, L. L.; Derekas, A. (2007). "The dissonant Cepheid XZ Ceti". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 461 (two): 613–618. arXiv:astro.ph/0609097. Bibcode:2007A&A...461..613S. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065690. S2CID 18245078.
  56. ^ Plachy, Eastward.; et al. (2020), "TESS observations of Cepheid stars: starting time light results", The Astrophysical Periodical Supplement Series, 253 (1): eleven, arXiv:2012.09709, Bibcode:2021ApJS..253...11P, doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abd4e3, S2CID 229297708

External links [edit]

  • McMaster Cepheid Photometry and Radial Velocity Data Archive
  • American Association of Variable Star Observers
  • Stellar pulsation theory - Regular versus irregular variability
  • Survey of Warsaw University at Las Campanas Observatory: OGLE-III (Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment) Variable Stars catalog website
  • David Dunlap Observatory of Toronto University: Galactic Classical Cepheids database

andrewswortatuslege.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cepheid_variable

0 Response to "what actually causes a cepheid to vary in apparent brightness?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel